jor_FAQManipulation 2.0__**UPDATE**__2.1

In this section you can share self-made extensions with other users of WYSIWYG Web Builder.
There is a dedicated section for commercial extensions.
Post Reply
User avatar
protectourlands
 
 
Posts: 443
Joined: Sat May 24, 2008 2:16 am
Contact:

Re: jor_FAQManipulation 1.0b

Post by protectourlands »

Hi Jordan

I'm trying to use FAQmanipulation with a master objects. It works fine in the default view, but not in any of the breakpoints. Can this be worked around?
jordan
 
 
Posts: 831
Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2007 1:56 pm
Contact:

Re: jor_FAQManipulation 1.0b

Post by jordan »

hello protectourlands,

try this quick update, - will release it later official, never updated for RWD - download here - jor_FAQManipulation1.2

hope this helps!:)
User avatar
protectourlands
 
 
Posts: 443
Joined: Sat May 24, 2008 2:16 am
Contact:

Re: jor_FAQManipulation 1.0b

Post by protectourlands »

Right on Jordan. Works perfectly! A thousand thank you's sir.
jordan
 
 
Posts: 831
Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2007 1:56 pm
Contact:

Re: jor_FAQManipulation 1.1__**UPDATE**__2.0

Post by jordan »

jor_FAQManipulation 2.0 - UPDATE!

01. enhanced/fix : abide WB breakpoint
01. changed : compiled with EB5.3.2

for full update history, demo and download see top post
User avatar
protectourlands
 
 
Posts: 443
Joined: Sat May 24, 2008 2:16 am
Contact:

Re: jor_FAQManipulation 1.1__**UPDATE**__2.0

Post by protectourlands »

Outstanding Jordan! One of your most useful extensions.

Thank you and best wishes for a prosperous 2017!
jordan
 
 
Posts: 831
Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2007 1:56 pm
Contact:

Re: jor_FAQManipulation 1.1__**UPDATE**__2.0

Post by jordan »

protectourlands wrote:Outstanding Jordan! One of your most useful extensions.

Thank you and best wishes for a prosperous 2017!
whoop whoop go-Od . :cool: . - and a super 2017 wish traveling your way - . :) .
User avatar
protectourlands
 
 
Posts: 443
Joined: Sat May 24, 2008 2:16 am
Contact:

Re: jor_FAQManipulation 2.0

Post by protectourlands »

Hi Jordan

A page done in WB11 using this awesome extension is no longer working in WB12. When I click the question nothing happens (both preview and after publish). Are there any known issues using jor_FAQManipulation in WB12?
jordan
 
 
Posts: 831
Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2007 1:56 pm
Contact:

Re: jor_FAQManipulation 2.0

Post by jordan »

hi protectourlands,

it works correct for me in WB12
does the jor_FAQManipulation_easystart project in the download work for you ?
User avatar
protectourlands
 
 
Posts: 443
Joined: Sat May 24, 2008 2:16 am
Contact:

Re: jor_FAQManipulation 2.0

Post by protectourlands »

Hi Jordan

No the demo is not working either, except #4 (the last one) which is populated through the WB extension.

It feels like it could be a setting in options but everything looks the same. Both javascript settings in options are unchecked and format is default.
jordan
 
 
Posts: 831
Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2007 1:56 pm
Contact:

Re: jor_FAQManipulation 2.0

Post by jordan »

maybe you have set a .js folder under - "Target Folder for File Types" - ?
do you have a live example so I can see what is happening
User avatar
protectourlands
 
 
Posts: 443
Joined: Sat May 24, 2008 2:16 am
Contact:

Re: jor_FAQManipulation 2.0

Post by protectourlands »

No it isn't that either. I cannot find anything that has changed.

(links removed)

The only thing I changed is I added a few icons and images to the footer in the new publish. Just to be sure I removed those and tested and it is sill broken. The older publish is WB11. It's a mystery. Thank you so much for looking at this.
Last edited by protectourlands on Tue May 30, 2017 5:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.
jordan
 
 
Posts: 831
Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2007 1:56 pm
Contact:

Re: jor_FAQManipulation 2.0

Post by jordan »

this is strange ? - hard to find, I can see an error occurs in jQuery
could you please set up a live demo of the jor_FAQManipulation_easystart project as it publishes for you as well
User avatar
protectourlands
 
 
Posts: 443
Joined: Sat May 24, 2008 2:16 am
Contact:

Re: jor_FAQManipulation 2.0

Post by protectourlands »

(link removed)

Thank you for looking at this Jordan
Last edited by protectourlands on Tue May 30, 2017 5:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
jordan
 
 
Posts: 831
Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2007 1:56 pm
Contact:

Re: jor_FAQManipulation 2.0

Post by jordan »

ah ok, I see now I think, - there is a prefix on the FAQ extension ?
do you have the latest WB jQuery FAQ installed - update your jQuery FAQ if not, does that fix it ?
User avatar
protectourlands
 
 
Posts: 443
Joined: Sat May 24, 2008 2:16 am
Contact:

Re: jor_FAQManipulation 2.0

Post by protectourlands »

I believe I am using the most current WB FAQ extension.The properties of the .uwbx file show Feb 23, 2017. It is likely that I updated to this version after I first built the page though. Maybe that has something to do with it?
jordan
 
 
Posts: 831
Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2007 1:56 pm
Contact:

Re: jor_FAQManipulation 2.0

Post by jordan »

i just installed the latest FAQ extension before posting, so I thought, it did not install:/
so, I was using an older version
that is the problem, the latest jQuery FAQ extension has been changed
the ID of the extension now has been given a prefix:/
I will ask Pablo if it can be changed back, if not I will have to create a fix for it - :? -

you could also in the meantime use the jQuery FAQ extension from your WB11 extension folder;)
User avatar
protectourlands
 
 
Posts: 443
Joined: Sat May 24, 2008 2:16 am
Contact:

Re: jor_FAQManipulation 2.0

Post by protectourlands »

Yes that would explain it. The working page was built in Dec 2016 so it used the older WB extension. I updated the extension in Feb 2017 but only needed to edit the page recently so I just discovered this.
User avatar
protectourlands
 
 
Posts: 443
Joined: Sat May 24, 2008 2:16 am
Contact:

Re: jor_FAQManipulation 2.0

Post by protectourlands »

I see what you are saying. Using an editor I changed the id in the manipulation js of the published page by adding "wb_" prefix and that resolved the issue. The old FAQ version writes the id without the prefix. I'm so glad you were able to figure this out. I hope there is an easy solution.
jordan
 
 
Posts: 831
Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2007 1:56 pm
Contact:

Re: jor_FAQManipulation 2.0

Post by jordan »

tomorrow I will post a fix for this problemO - protectourlands - :) -
User avatar
protectourlands
 
 
Posts: 443
Joined: Sat May 24, 2008 2:16 am
Contact:

Re: jor_FAQManipulation 2.0

Post by protectourlands »

Jordan, you're the best!
User avatar
protectourlands
 
 
Posts: 443
Joined: Sat May 24, 2008 2:16 am
Contact:

Re: jor_FAQManipulation 2.0

Post by protectourlands »

I just thought of something. I'm slow but eventually I get there. Since jor_FAQManipulation has an empty field for the FAQ object id, all I have to do is write "wb_" then the FAQ object id. Problem solved.
jordan
 
 
Posts: 831
Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2007 1:56 pm
Contact:

Re: jor_FAQManipulation 2.0

Post by jordan »

protectourlands wrote: Tue May 30, 2017 7:23 pm I just thought of something. I'm slow but eventually I get there. Since jor_FAQManipulation has an empty field for the FAQ object id, all I have to do is write "wb_" then the FAQ object id. Problem solved.
yup, good thinking, - I also wanted to opt this as a workaround yesterday
then I thought, I would have to add more code to cover both id modes if I needed to fix, so I thought let's not open that route
but you found it yourself, aargh - :evil: - your a bit too smart - :mrgreen: - !

so a full fix, this should work on both old/new jQuery FAQ and with/without prefix

tjaptjoi!:)
jordan
 
 
Posts: 831
Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2007 1:56 pm
Contact:

Re: jor_FAQManipulation 2.0__**UPDATE**__2.1

Post by jordan »

jor_FAQManipulation 2.1 - UPDATE!

01. fix : fix jQuery FAQ extension id change

for full update history, demo and download see top post
User avatar
protectourlands
 
 
Posts: 443
Joined: Sat May 24, 2008 2:16 am
Contact:

Re: jor_FAQManipulation 2.0__**UPDATE**__2.1

Post by protectourlands »

Your fix works perfectly Jordan. A big thank you as always!
Post Reply